Dori Week 10 PAP- The Benefit of Debate

    In her poem “Enlightenment,”  Natasha Trethewey recounts the time when she and her father debated Thomas Jefferson’s history, character, and relationship with slaves. She begins the poem with imagery and symbolism as Trethewey describes “the portrait of Jefferson that hangs at Monticello” as being “two-toned...as if the artist meant to contrast his bright knowledge, its dark subtext.”  I find this observation intriguing because it not only helps me visualize the referenced image of Jefferson but also uniquely sets the tone for the rest of the poem as there are generally two opinions about Jefferson: that he was heroic and honorable or hypocritical and racist. The name of the poem “Enlightenment” also seems to connect with the concept of being “two-toned” because although the Enlightenment is typically known as an era of intellect, discovery, and natural rights, these prospects were not, in reality, available to everyone.

    Trethewey then compares her perspective, as a black woman, with the insight of her white father. For example, she says her father explained how “out of necessity” Jefferson needed to own slaves and that “his own moral philosophy meant he could not have fathered those children” that he had with slaves.  This explanation shows that Trethewey’s father believes that Jefferson did not intend to be harmfully racist or morally corrupt. While she does not fully agree with her father’s opinion and finds Jefferson to be more problematic, Trethewey notes, “I did not know then the subtext of our story...or that my father could believe he’d made me better.” This quote shows that Trethewey eventually realized that hearing a belief that differed from her own enabled her to become more open-minded and knowledgeable of the multiple sides of the matter.  

    By the end, she also understands the importance of learning about history and its various interpretations when she writes, “this history [links us]--white father, black daughter--even as it renders us other to each other.” I found this quote a bit confusing to process at first from the “other to each other” phrase, but I soon figured out that this means that while Trethewey and her father may be racially categorized differently and separated, their distinct backgrounds and experiences allow them to become more aware of diverse viewpoints and relate to one another in unique ways. 

    I found this poem interesting and informative as it truly demonstrates how identity and racial background play a role in the way one perceives a narrative. It also emphasized the critical value of not closing yourself off to other opinions as they can enrich you in some way. This is crucial to consider especially now when there is so much division between (and in) political parties. Let me know what your thoughts are on the message of the poem! Have you ever felt you benefited from engaging in a debate with somebody else who had distinctive views from you? 


Link to poem: 

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/57697/enlightenment-56d23b7175cc0

Comments

  1. Hey Dori! Wow, this is such an insightful analysis. I truly agree with everything you said, and you brought up a great point about how engaging with people from different backgrounds can give more perspective. I think it is hard for many people to move past the stereotype or assumption they might have about a person or their opinions, therefor leading them to avoid conversations with them. That is definitely something we as a society must work on so that everyone is comfortable and open to dialogue with people that are different from them. I also think it is really interesting how the author compared the lighting in the painting to being two-toned like the complexities and arguable hypocrisy of some of the founding fathers, which is definitely something I have thought about during history class.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Dori!

    I definitely agree with you that the importance of debate is the central message to this poem. I believe civil debate is one of the most important aspects of exercising and engaging in free speech, and I really enjoy debating others on controversial topics such as capitalism v/s socialism, gun control, climate change, abortion, religion, gender, etc. I have benefited many times from debating with others as I am able to hear opposing viewpoints, become more open-minded, and learn more about the opposition in order to strengthen my own arguments by pointing out the flaws in the arguments of others. Do you think that free debate can exist in countries with bans on certain types of speech such as “hate speech”?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ethan! That's a good question, I think free debate can still exist in countries with bans on certain types of speech such as "hate speech." For instance, here in the United States, hate speech is generally not allowed or greatly discouraged, but free debate is still a very large part of this country. I don't think hate speech should be permitted anywhere and don't believe it would halt free debate in any way, since debate is ideally supposed to be civil and not incite hatred/violence. If you have any thoughts, though, I'd be interested in hearing them!

      Delete
  3. Hi Dori, I do think that debate is an important thing in society, even when you know that you will not agree with the person and nobody will change their mind, it is still important to see where everyone is coming from in their viewpoints even if you can't understand them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ethan Week 3- “Looking at a Coyote”, by Javier Zamora